San Diego Padres - San Francisco Giants - MLB

Wager: $200. San Diego Padres will play Game 2 vs. San Francisco Giants at 10:15 ET. Cahill (4-3, 3.14) will have the ball for the Padres. In his last 3 games, he allowed 5 R, 5 E combined. Cahill is 2-2 with a 4.23 ERA in his last five career starts vs. the Giants, as he beat them 7-1 on June 16. Nevertheless, he has 2.16 ERA over his last 6 starts. He will face J. Samardzija (4-11, 4.86), who pitched 6 inn. during the same game, the 1-7 Giants' loss, allowing high 9 H and 7 R. He is 1-2 with a 4.94 ERA in his last five-5 career starts vs. the Padres, and became the first Giants starter since Lincecum's 2012 season to have 10 losses before the All-Star break. Hence, we feel again that San Diego Padres are unfairly priced. The online cappers are picking the Padres, which worries me, since, it is close to our position of this game today.  With that said, we pick the San Diego Padres with the spread of (+2.5 Runs), which is far away from yesterday's price, but, we want to win no matter what, and to keep our great track record intact, so we feel that San Diego will cover easily (+2.5) runs @ (-275) @ bet365. Click here for odds systems. Unless listed, our Bet is $100. Note, Gematria and Numerology:  Today's Numerology numbers to follow are: 10, 18, 20, 21, 27, 28, 38, 45, 47, 56, 65. In today's game the Gematria codes actually favor Jeff Samardzija to get the direct win, as he is aligning with code 201 in LRG,  which stands for "to be or become bright, to light, to lighten, to enlighten" (tied to Freemasonry), and 232 in LRG, which is "the strong one, the mighty one, hero, "Lion of God", mockers, parasites (the 'Masters of the World', LOL)".

UPDATE, July 22, 2017: San Diego Padres 12-9 San Francisco Giants. San Diego Padres beat the Giants again by 3 runs in Game 2: The Padres used the 11th against right-hander Kontos, as Szczur delivered the go-ahead hit resulting in Jose Pirela and Carlos Asuaje to get RBI singles, and San Diego won. The final score 12-9 makes the No. 129. Note, "MLB is rigged" = 129 in EK#3. As I stated above, Our Bet of (+2.5 R.) easily won: $200 investm. returns $268, $68 Net Profit, 34% ROI. Note, "Szczur" = 32 in LRG, but "Black Magic" = 32 in LRG. 'Szczur'? What kind of fam. name is that, and who gave it to him? This is getting unreal here! People, pay attention! We won huge last night with a 5-team Parlay with high multiple odds: 7.47x Your Money(!), which I consider a brilliant play (I am not bragging!): Click here to see. The bet selection of the Parlay I listed below as my potential picks, which won: From the list of the MLB game predictions in the "Comments" section, we went 6-1:  Tampa Bay 3-4 Texas Rangers "Under the total of 10.00 Runs" opt. won easily, as I stated below: "this shall be a lock". The Orioles and White Sox covered the spread of (+1.5-2.5 R.). Washington Nationals covered the spread of (+1.5 R.), and BOS R.S.-L.A Angels went "Under 9 Runs" @ bet365 (for U.S. based accounts the game is a 'loss' on the 'under', unfortunately, since you've had only 7.5 runs to play with!), and Boston R.S. to win the 2nd half was a loss. Overall, we were 7-1 in MLB picks last night. Our overall MLB record in the last 4 weeks is now 73-24, 75.25%. People wonder, but I will tell everyone again: Our track record is so good because we are playing 'safe' by buying additional runs at all times, thus, it helps! My advice to all of you is to quickly abandon the strategy to Bet only on direct winners. It is NOT needed at this point. See my play above: 34% ROI is 34%, period! I would rather win!  Secondly, do not rely solely on 1 detail / category, when analyzing the games. I've said many times, we are in a "coded Matrix", and every single event in life has its own code. Thus, it depends on the circumstances around that specific event for the final outcome (of the event) to be formed, which might differ from what you expected! Remember this! In my case, although the single Gematria codes favored the SF Giants' pitcher, I have looked at the overall picture, and made the "balanced and safe" play, i.e., to take the underdog with (+2.5) runs [in the Parlay, I even had +3.5 runs!], which was reasonably priced for that particular option. Cheers!